Re: Adding Java flames to the scripting fire

Subject: Re: Adding Java flames to the scripting fire
From: Ashleigh Gordon (agordon@bigpond.net.au)
Date: Thu Jul 06 2000 - 02:31:58 CDT

• sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
• Next message: Thomas Briggs: "Fix for broken Win32 build"
• Previous message: Mo DeJong: "Adding Java flames to the scripting fire"
• Maybe in reply to: Mo DeJong: "Adding Java flames to the scripting fire"
• Next in thread: Martin Sevior: "Re: Adding Java flames to the scripting fire"
• Maybe reply: Ashleigh Gordon: "Re: Adding Java flames to the scripting fire"

Not a bad idea. I think the main thing that we have to take away from the
discussion is that we really need a framework, such as the one you
suggested, that supports a variety of languages, rather than just choosing
one or two languages.

Ash

• Next message: Thomas Briggs: "Fix for broken Win32 build"
• Previous message: Mo DeJong: "Adding Java flames to the scripting fire"
• Maybe in reply to: Mo DeJong: "Adding Java flames to the scripting fire"
• Next in thread: Martin Sevior: "Re: Adding Java flames to the scripting fire"
• Maybe reply: Ashleigh Gordon: "Re: Adding Java flames to the scripting fire"

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b25 : Thu Jul 06 2000 - 02:32:30 CDT