Subject: re: [RFC2] new findPointCoords implementation
From: Jesper Skov (jskov@redhat.com)
Date: Sat Jun 03 2000 - 13:34:31 CDT
>>>>> "sam" == sam th <sam@uchicago.edu> writes:
sam> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
sam> Further debugging results for the crash in bug 449 (as I
sam> mentioned in my last email).
[snip]
sam> We are going to segfault, no matter what. This is bad.
sam> I hope you know what to fix, Jesper.
And from the previous mail:
sam> In trying to test 841 I discovered that inserting a page break in a blank
sam> document causes the following assert, and then a segfault.
sam> **** (1) Assert ****
sam> **** (1) NULL != pRun at fl_BlockLayout.cpp:964 ****
sam> **** (1) Continue ? (y/n) [y] : y
sam> This is caused by your patch, AFAIK. It does not happend if you have
sam> already typed and deleted a page break, but only on a 1 page document.
findPointCoords starts at line 985 in my version of the file. By any
chance did you test this without the patch I posted a few days back
which Martin committed?
Without that patch, the document will contain only one Run after the
ctrl+return in a document, and that Run cannot contain point. So it
would assert for sure.
Jesper
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b25 : Sat Jun 03 2000 - 13:34:37 CDT