Subject: Re: previews for embedded objects
From: Paul Rohr (paul@abisource.com)
Date: Wed Mar 15 2000 - 14:33:06 CST
If it doesn't make a difference to expat (and this should be tested), I'd
vote for using default namespaces (option 2). If nothing else, it trims
down the bloat in the file format:
At 03:45 AM 3/15/00 -0600, sam th wrote:
>or 2
><d ...>
><svg xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/SVG">
> <path .../>
></svg?
></d>
AFAICT, the extra verbosity wouldn't gain us anything. How badly would this
raise the hackles of other hardcore XML fans?
Paul,
file format minimalist
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b25 : Wed Mar 15 2000 - 14:27:33 CST