Subject: Re: final bits for CJK patch
From: Chih-Wei Huang (cwhuang@linux.org.tw)
Date: Fri Nov 10 2000 - 04:07:18 CST
Vlad Harchev ¼g¹D¡G
>
> In fact, I sent the same old version of that patch with this letter. Sorry.
> Here is a correct version (with those ut_*.cpp bits), and also it adds 136 as
> value \fcharset for BIG5 docs.
Hmmm... I just test your p3 patch but no lucky!
When I try to save document containing Chinese character(only one)
as RTF, AW crashed immediately and silently.
It left an half-saved file as
{\rtf1\ansi\ansicpg950\deff0
{\fonttbl
{\f0\fnil\fcharset136\fprq0\fttruetype Times New Roman;}}
{\colortbl
\red0\green0\blue0;}
\kerning0\cf0\viewkind1\paperw12240\paperh15840\margl1440\margr1440\widowctl
\sectd\sbknone\colsx360
\pard{\f0
I also test in zh_CN.GB2312 locale, it crashed as zh_TW.Big5.
The half-saved file:
{\rtf1\ansi\ansicpg950\deff0 <-- why cpg950? should be cpg936
{\fonttbl
{\f0\fnil\fcharset134\fprq0\fttruetype Times New Roman;}}
{\colortbl
\red0\green0\blue0;}
\kerning0\cf0\viewkind1\paperw12240\paperh15840\margl1440\margr1440\widowctl
\sectd\sbknone\colsx360
\pard{\f0
BTW, in this patch, you use
+ {"0x404","zh_CN.BIG5"},
+ {"0x804","zh_CN.GB2312"},
+ {"0x404","zh_TW.BIG5"},
+ {"0x804","zh_TW.GB2312"},
However, we use zh_TW.Big5 as our official locale name.
Does it matter?
In glibc 2.2, it always normalized encoding name
of locale to lowercase, i.e., zh_TW.big5,
In fact, the following locale names are all accepted
by glibc 2.2: zh_TW, zh_TW.Big5, zh_TW.big5.
-- ~ Chih-Wei Huang (cwhuang) 'v' E-Mail : cwhuang@linux.org.tw // \\ CLDP Project : http://www.linux.org.tw/CLDP/ (Coordinator) /( )\ CLE Project : http://cle.linux.org.tw/CLE/ (Developer) ^`~'^ HomePage : http://www.cwhuang.idv.tw/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b25 : Fri Nov 10 2000 - 04:08:11 CST