Re: MSVCP50.DLL

Subject: Re: MSVCP50.DLL
From: Mike Nordell (tamlin@algonet.se)
Date: Sun Nov 26 2000 - 22:43:52 CST

• sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
• Next message: Sam TH: "Release Cutoff Postponed"
• Previous message: Mike Nordell: "Re: commit: Multi View List fix and MS Word Import improvements."
• In reply to: Pierre Abbat: "Re: MSVCP50.DLL"
• Reply: Mike Nordell: "Re: MSVCP50.DLL"

Pierre Abbat wrote:
> >Perhaps we should change the build to link with that library statically?
>
> I wouldn't. Some people have it, so linking statically would needlessly
make
> the binary bigger.

Well, AFAIK it's only used for the few wide char string functions. Yes, it's
true it would grow the binary, but have anyone ever compared a static
build - with *this* library, not the complete C/C++ runtime library - to
compare the difference?

I do care about size. Actually, I'm fanatic about size sometimes, this is
not one of those times.

/Mike

• Next message: Sam TH: "Release Cutoff Postponed"
• Previous message: Mike Nordell: "Re: commit: Multi View List fix and MS Word Import improvements."
• In reply to: Pierre Abbat: "Re: MSVCP50.DLL"
• Reply: Mike Nordell: "Re: MSVCP50.DLL"

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b25 : Sun Nov 26 2000 - 22:42:46 CST