Subject: Re: [RFC] A Proposal for Binary Release Management
From: sam th (sam@uchicago.edu)
Date: Tue Oct 03 2000 - 18:30:21 CDT
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 19 Sep 2000, Eric W. Sink wrote:
>
> 1. The trademarks should be a non-issue. The stuff in the
> tree *does* reflect the fact that we used to have two sets
> of marks, one for official builds, and one for everything
> else. Thaat distinction existed to support a business
> strategy which no longer exists, so we should be able
> to simply things a bit.
>
Just a question about this - does this mean that you won't mind if we
distribute AbiWord build with the trademarked images for distribution?
sam th
sam@uchicago.edu
http://www.abisource.com/~sam/
GnuPG Key:
http://pgp5.ai.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xCABD33FC
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.1 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
iD8DBQE52mwPt+kM0Mq9M/wRAkGrAJ9PGPL57jjX9PqzCxjs7zQ1QNXahwCgyudu
GXAwxDq9YIjvYhoURSLsWEE=
=4MuT
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b25 : Tue Oct 03 2000 - 18:28:59 CDT