Re: UT_String


Subject: Re: UT_String
From: Joaquin Cuenca Abela (cuenca@celium.net)
Date: Thu Apr 12 2001 - 14:20:06 CDT


On 12 Apr 2001 21:20:10 +0200, Mike Nordell wrote:
> Regarding UT_String. Is anyone aware of *any* place the (dangerous) "const
> char*" conversion operator is used? If not, I'd like to remove that one.

+1 :-)
Maybe we should remove it, and see if there are any "mistakes" in the
code :-)

Cheers,

-- 
Joaquín Cuenca Abela
cuenca@celium.net



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b25 : Thu Apr 12 2001 - 14:21:22 CDT