Subject: Re: UT_String
From: Mike Nordell (tamlin@algonet.se)
Date: Sat Apr 14 2001 - 18:11:45 CDT
Joaquín Cuenca Abela wrote:
> (now, Mike, if you still think that char& operator[] with the
> implementation that I explain in this email is broken, a hack, etc. we
> can start a discussion)
It'll work in this new implementation. If it indeed fits a need (i.e. anyone
needs write access to the strings individual characters), the UT_ASSERT will
take care of the errors.
Thanks for the explanation.
/Mike
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b25 : Sat Apr 14 2001 - 18:11:11 CDT