Subject: Re: gdk-pixbuf vs. ImageMagick
From: Hubert Figuiere (hfiguiere@teaser.fr)
Date: Thu Apr 26 2001 - 06:53:52 CDT
According to Paul Rohr <paul@abisource.com>:
>
> 5. Use gdk-pixbuf instead.
>
> I'm not clear on what *you* mean by #5. Some folks seem to believe that
> something like gdk-pixbuf could be ported to become a lighter-weight
> solution than miniIM for all our platforms. If I read Dom correctly, he's
> been proposing to only use gdk-pixbuf on GTK/GNOME.
>
Dom is advocating the use of gdk-pixbuf as a native loader and renderer
for GNOME build. By providing the needed infrastructures in the XP
framework, this is doable.
Hub
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b25 : Thu Apr 26 2001 - 06:54:31 CDT