Subject: Re: BugZilla - stale bugs
From: Jesper Skov (jskov@zoftcorp.dk)
Date: Fri Dec 14 2001 - 07:41:37 CST
On Fri, 2001-12-14 at 14:18, Bryce Nesbitt wrote:
> Paul Egli wrote:
> >
> > Quoting Jesper Skov <jskov@zoftcorp.dk>:
> > > I hereby declare bugs that haven't been touched for 2+ months for stale.
> >
> > That might be a bit hasty, IMHO. Perhaps 2+ binary releases... (?)
> >
> >
> > > In the future, I will close the following classes of stale bugs:
> > >
> > > o QA TO QUALIFY:
> > > Apparently whoever filed the bug (and others) are not annoyed
> > > by this bug anymore, and they forgot to close it.
>
>
> Hold on! As a bug reporter, I assumed "QA TO QUALIFY" meant somebody "official"
> at AbiSource needed to close it. If it read "PLEASE VERIFY FIX" then I'd feel
> free to close it or at least comment that it's fixed.
That is indeed what it means. I'd argue we could document our way out of
this, but I suspect changing the name of the state as you suggest would
be better.
I'm sure Sam could do this when he gets back to a proper connection.
Jesper
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b25 : Fri Dec 14 2001 - 07:41:39 CST