Subject: Re: The Need For Standard Release Procedures
From: Martin Sevior (msevior@mccubbin.ph.unimelb.edu.au)
Date: Sun Dec 16 2001 - 18:23:53 CST
Hi Jared,
This a comprehensive release strategy which I believe we should
follow for 1.0. It's disadvantage is of course it takes two weeks to
complete.
While we still haven't finalized 0.9.6.1 at least we're still developing.
Cheers
Martin
On Sun, 16 Dec 2001, Jared Davis wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On September 26, I proposed that we adopt a standard release strategy and
> proivded a draft document. No discussion resulted from this.
>
> I would like to re-suggest this. I would like to point out that at present:
>
> + An i386 RPM on SourceForge does not identify itself as gtk or gnome
>
> + Savannah does not have several packages that are on SourceForge:
> (MacOS package, Source RPM, Source Tarball, Win32 package)
>
> + SourceForge does not have BIDI packages available
>
> I would really appreciate it if we could coordinate the release of packages
> better and get a truly comprehensive release strategy into place.
>
> I've attached my initial proposal for your review. Can we agree on this or
> something similar?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Jared
>
> --
> Love all, serve all.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b25 : Sun Dec 16 2001 - 18:24:07 CST