Re: UT_Bool vs bool


Subject: Re: UT_Bool vs bool
From: Martin Sevior (msevior@mccubbin.ph.unimelb.edu.au)
Date: Sat Feb 03 2001 - 15:00:43 CST


On Sat, 3 Feb 2001, Sam TH wrote:

> On Sat, Feb 03, 2001 at 11:35:42AM +0100, Mike Nordell wrote:
> >
> > Should we allow bool?
> >
>
> Well, Dom claims that all of our compilers worked fine with bool. If
> this was really in the 0.7.12 release, then +1 from me too.
>

There are also various bool definitions in fp_PageSize (about 3 or 4).

Abi works fine with bool, so I'm another +1.

Martin



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b25 : Sat Feb 03 2001 - 15:01:00 CST