Re: Is there any opposition to a debian/ top-level subdir?

Subject: Re: Is there any opposition to a debian/ top-level subdir?
From: Aaron Lehmann (aaronl@vitelus.com)
Date: Mon Feb 12 2001 - 16:12:46 CST

• sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
• Next message: Aaron Lehmann: "Re: Is there any opposition to a debian/ top-level subdir?"
• Previous message: Jesper Skov: "Re: Counting bugs..."
• In reply to: Sam TH: "Re: Is there any opposition to a debian/ top-level subdir?"
• Next in thread: Darren O. Benham: "Re: Is there any opposition to a debian/ top-level subdir?"
• Next in thread: Paul Rohr: "Re: Is there any opposition to a debian/ top-level subdir?"
• Reply: Aaron Lehmann: "Re: Is there any opposition to a debian/ top-level subdir?"

On Mon, Feb 12, 2001 at 12:07:07PM -0600, Sam TH wrote:
> Aaron: what if the .diff.gz just added a symlink

That is my prefered solution, but I don't think that .diffs can
describe symlinks.

• Next message: Aaron Lehmann: "Re: Is there any opposition to a debian/ top-level subdir?"
• Previous message: Jesper Skov: "Re: Counting bugs..."
• In reply to: Sam TH: "Re: Is there any opposition to a debian/ top-level subdir?"
• Next in thread: Darren O. Benham: "Re: Is there any opposition to a debian/ top-level subdir?"
• Next in thread: Paul Rohr: "Re: Is there any opposition to a debian/ top-level subdir?"
• Reply: Aaron Lehmann: "Re: Is there any opposition to a debian/ top-level subdir?"

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b25 : Mon Feb 12 2001 - 16:12:55 CST