Subject: Re: Commit: We really *do* need autoheader
From: Martin Sevior (msevior@mccubbin.ph.unimelb.edu.au)
Date: Fri Jul 06 2001 - 09:22:45 CDT
On Fri, 6 Jul 2001, Frodo Looijaard wrote:
> Martin Sevior wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > On Thu, 5 Jul 2001, Frodo Looijaard wrote:
> >
> > > (Frodo) We really *do* need autoheader
> > >
> > > `plam' commented out the autoheader command, but we really need it. Or
> > > other things will have to change (which I have not the courage to look
> > > into at the moment).
> > >
> >
> > What??? Why? They work fine for me.
>
> At least we would have to stop generating config.h from config.h.in,
> because configure bails out on it now (config.h.in is generated by
> autoheader). Perhaps it is just removing this line from configure.in,
> though.
>
> Thanks,
> Frodo
Sorry Frodo, I thought you were refering to my pt_PT_Styles.cpp
definitions of automatic Heading Numbering!
Cheers
Martin
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b25 : Fri Jul 06 2001 - 09:23:07 CDT