Subject: commit -- fixed UT_RBTree erase method
From: Joaquin Cuenca Abela (e98cuenc@yahoo.com)
Date: Thu Jul 19 2001 - 19:01:11 CDT
That has been more difficult than what I though.
Now this pesk^H^H^H^H cool & fast rb tree works fine.
I've tested it with 100000 random insertions and
deletes, checking its integrity after each operation,
and so far everything is ok.
So now the bug that stores "no-more-used-images" is
definitively dead.
Cheers,
P.S.: Anybody knows if we can safely suppose that our
supported compilers do the right thing in presence of
an inlined function that declares a static variable?
-- Joaquín Cuenca Abela e98cuenc@yahoo.com__________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b25 : Thu Jul 19 2001 - 19:01:24 CDT