Subject: Re: profile results for new UT_* implementations?
From: Martin Sevior (msevior@mccubbin.ph.unimelb.edu.au)
Date: Wed Jun 20 2001 - 08:35:00 CDT
On Wed, 20 Jun 2001, Aaron Lehmann wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 20, 2001 at 01:15:52PM +0200, Joaqu?n Cuenca Abela wrote:
> > if you don't know the "1.0in; " value at the same time than
> > "margin-left: ", then it can be a perfectly valid example
>
> No, I was just hoping that for this particular example the statements
> were separated by a conditional or something. Otherwise it would be
> similar to:
>
> write(1, "H", 1);
> write(1, "e", 1);
> write(1, "l", 1);
> write(1, "l", 1);
> write(1, "o", 1);
> write(1, " ", 1);
> write(1, "W", 1);
> write(1, "o", 1);
> write(1, "r", 1);
> write(1, "l", 1);
> write(1, "d", 1);
> write(1, "\n", 1);
>
> Well not quite so bad, but you get my point :).
>
Just look in ap_Dialog_Styles.cpp to see lots of good uses for
UT_String. It's almost like progamming in python :-) Saves lots of painful
string hackery.
Cheers
Martin
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b25 : Wed Jun 20 2001 - 08:35:31 CDT