Subject: Re: Bug Status
From: Jesper Skov (jskov@cambridge.redhat.com)
Date: Sun Mar 11 2001 - 15:29:44 CST
>>>>> "Tom" == Tom Briggs <tomabi@jules.briggs.cx> writes:
Tom> On Sun, 11 Mar 2001, Jesper Skov wrote:
>> http://www.abisource.com/mailinglists/abiword-user/01/February/0056.html
Tom> This was a good write-up, but it's missing one critical piece
Tom> of information: what should happen after a bug gets marked QA TO
Tom> VERIFY? What's the process for officially marking it as closed?
Tom> Under what criteria can a bug fix be considered verified? Can I
Tom> verify my own bugs if using an official release containing the
Tom> fix?
Tom> (These are all rhetorical questions, of course. I know the
Tom> answers. :P The otherwise complete write-up just seems to be
Tom> missing info about the last part of the bug life-cycle. )
Yeah, good points. Ta. I'll add some more and add it to the web pages
somewhere. Don't want to keep referring to mailing list postings when
we have a web site.
Jesper
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b25 : Sun Mar 11 2001 - 15:29:49 CST