Subject: Re: Topic: Footnotes/Endnotes and 1.0
From: Martin Sevior (msevior@mccubbin.ph.unimelb.edu.au)
Date: Wed May 02 2001 - 02:00:16 CDT
I won't steal Pat's thunder by writing about how footnotes/endnotes should
work. We've chatted about this over IRC however and I think that this
feature is slightly less complicated than directly edittable
headers/footers. It shares some of the same issues but has it's own
difficulties. All are solvable however and I think we've thought of all
the gotcha's.
Given that we now have edittable headers and footers and Pat's willing to
work on it, I think a one month time-scale is not unrealistic.
Cheers
Martin
On Wed, 2 May 2001, Patrick Lam wrote:
> So the thing about footnotes is that I'm willing to start implementing
> them in the near future.
>
> If I don't finish implementing them in the near future, we should not hold
> 1.0 for them. But if I can get them to Just Work, then we can add it.
>
> I'll say more technical things soon.
>
> June 1 seems like a good date to aim for.
>
> pat
>
>
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b25 : Sat May 26 2001 - 03:51:00 CDT