Subject: Re: Topic: Versioning scheme and 1.0
From: Daniel Lawrence (iwritecode@programmer.net)
Date: Wed May 02 2001 - 21:45:16 CDT
I second that. Affirmative on "integer based" (opposed to
major.minor.rev) versioning.
Jesper Skov wrote:
>
> I just wanted to have an "official" poll on my suggestion for the
> alternative versioning scheme. Go read my posting on that:
> http://www.abisource.com/mailinglists/abiword-dev/01/April/1264.html
>
> But substitute the next version with 2 instead of 42 as in the mail.
>
> I really think it'll make a moot point of the current discussions of
> what features are critical for a 1.0 release - and in particular, help
> our users to think of AbiWord as something that evolves one step at a
> time, not something that has to be judged and tried on on major
> revision releases.
>
> Thanks,
> Jesper
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b25 : Sat May 26 2001 - 03:51:00 CDT