Subject: Re: Patch: Fix for Bug 1164, 2nd try
From: Andrew Dunbar (hippietrail@yahoo.com)
Date: Mon May 21 2001 - 11:50:26 CDT
Hubert Figuiere wrote:
>
> According to Vlad Harchev <hvv@hippo.ru>:
> >
> > As for the patch - let me suggest few more case statements (for charset ->
> > iconv's charset name) switch (excerpt from OpenOffice sources - please adapt
> > them apropriately for AW):
> >
> > case 77: eTextEncoding = RTL_TEXTENCODING_APPLE_ROMAN;break;
> > case 130: eTextEncoding = RTL_TEXTENCODING_MS_1361; break;
> > case 255: eTextEncoding = RTL_TEXTENCODING_IBM_850; break;
>
> I'll handle it. But is OEM charset the same as IBM 850 (aka CP850) ?
> I have found nothing in the RTF specs for all these 3 charsets.
It looks like some values are in use but not in the documentation.
There's some insights here: http://shlimazl.nm.ru/eng/fonts_ttf.htm
Andrew.
-- http://linguaphile.sourceforge.net _________________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b25 : Sat May 26 2001 - 03:51:05 CDT