Subject: Re: style => name?
From: Martin Sevior (msevior@mccubbin.ph.unimelb.edu.au)
Date: Mon Sep 10 2001 - 19:21:06 CDT
On Mon, 10 Sep 2001, Dom Lachowicz wrote:
> Quoting Martin Sevior <msevior@mccubbin.ph.unimelb.edu.au>:
>
>
> > Dom, you had a lot to with styles, do you have an opinion? I'll do the
> > work to revert to the "name"/"style" split if you agree with Paul.
>
> Hi, just back from a weekend away from the internet :)
>
> I agree with Paul. We should:
>
> 1) Use 1 consisten naming and code convention
> 2) Release a new version shortly (Hub suggests calling it 0.9.4 as opposed to
> 0.9.3-2) with these fixes
>
> Thanks!
OK. Will do. I'll remove all the name => style changes.
Martin
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b25 : Mon Sep 10 2001 - 19:21:13 CDT