Re: linux.mk

From: Blue Lizard (webmaster@dofty.zzn.com)
Date: Sat Apr 06 2002 - 20:09:04 EST

  • Next message: Blue Lizard: "Re: linux.mk"

    Just for kicks, I did similar to what i talk about, but left out/deleted
    things that may have confused matters. This was used for my 0995 build.
    ATTACHED: linux.mk

    Regards.

    On Sat, 2002-04-06 at 19:54, Blue Lizard wrote:
    > Oops. I see that the way this was done was to properly handle defaults,
    > but as you can see, that had side effects (unwanted ones).
    >
    > On Sat, 2002-04-06 at 19:48, Blue Lizard wrote:
    > > Well, here's where I first noticed the problem. My make ABI_OPT_PROF=1
    > > install_dbg (there were other variables, but this is all that's
    > > pertinent) did not produce the debugging symbols. I look in
    > > src/config/platforms/linux.mk and see that ABI_OPT_(OPTIMIZE, GNOME,
    > > XML, DEBUG, &c) are only checked AFTER ABI_OPT_PROF is shown to not be
    > > set.
    > > I believe there is a reason for this, possibly regarding the size of the
    > > build with certain options put together. What is it?
    > >
    > > To change I would put not in the if hierarchy (currently present) these
    > > options, but sequential, and make things like OPTIMIZER = $OPTIMIZER
    > > <and then the meat>
    > >
    > > Someone fill me with knowledge please :-).
    > >
    > > Regards
    > > -Mark
    > >
    >



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sun Apr 07 2002 - 01:09:20 EST