utf-8 vs. utf-32

From: Tomas Frydrych (tomas@frydrych.uklinux.net)
Date: Tue Apr 23 2002 - 10:28:03 EDT

  • Next message: Tomas Frydrych: "single or multiple internal encodings"

    > Andrew Dunbar wrote:
    > I want the piecetable and layout engine to work for
    > all the world's languages. Being optimized for speed
    > is also good. I won't sacrifice #1 for #2.

    The question of choosing utf-8 over utf-32 or vice versa has nothing
    at all to do with the combining characters. utf-8 does not make
    handling combining characters easier, nor does utf-32 make it
    more difficult, or the other way around. utf-8 will not make AW any
    more capable of handling all world's languages than utf-32. utf-8
    requires more processing time for all people, utf-32 more memory
    for most people. That's the only objective issue in making the
    choice. Another, subjective, issue to consider is that transition to
    utf-32 will be very simple and transition to uft-8 will not.

    > Microsoft Word handles these things well.
    MS Word does not use utf-8 internally. But that is neither an
    argument for using it, nor for not using it.

    Tomas



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Apr 23 2002 - 10:33:51 EDT