Re: single or multiple internal encodings

From: Karl Ove Hufthammer (huftis@bigfoot.com)
Date: Tue Apr 23 2002 - 11:31:54 EDT

  • Next message: Karl Ove Hufthammer: "Re: utf-8 vs. utf-32"

    "Tomas Frydrych" <tomas@frydrych.uklinux.net> wrote in
    news:3CC57D83.26459.97D3E6@localhost:

    > Currently are not consistent. The Win32 build uses utf-8,
    > Linux the encoding of current locale. The advantage of using
    > the locale encoding is the size of the file, for unless you
    > use only characters from basic ASCII, utf-8 needs at least two
    > bytes for each. The other advantage of using the locale
    > encoding is that the user can view/search, etc. the raw files.
    > This is quite important to a number of users, and I think we
    > should retain this.

    On the other hand, XML parsers are only *required* to support
    'UTF-8' and 'UTF-16' (and some do only support this).

    -- 
    Karl Ove Hufthammer
    


    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Apr 23 2002 - 11:34:18 EDT