From: Karl Ove Hufthammer (huftis@bigfoot.com)
Date: Fri Apr 26 2002 - 03:10:42 EDT
Andrew Dunbar <hippietrail@yahoo.com> wrote in
news:20020425012624.50779.qmail@web9607.mail.yahoo.com:
> But they're very confusing
> for both users and developers.
> For English ligatures (optional ligatures) I would
> suggest an inline <ligate> tag which would do nothing
> if put around non-ligatable characters. A <noligate>
> tag also if we decide to go with an "auto-ligate"
> option.
One advantage of using ZWJ/ZWNJ is that they get exported
correctly automatically when exporting to Unicode-aware
fileformats. And according to W3C & The Unicode C., they *are*
suitable for use in markup languages / XML
<URL: http://www.unicode.org/unicode/reports/tr20/#Format >.
-- Karl Ove Hufthammer
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Apr 26 2002 - 03:15:17 EDT