Re: Any more comments on Next Generation layout?

From: Martin Sevior (msevior@mccubbin.ph.unimelb.edu.au)
Date: Mon Apr 29 2002 - 07:51:18 EDT

  • Next message: Tomas Frydrych: "Re: Pango on windows"

    On Mon, 29 Apr 2002, [iso-8859-1] Andrew Dunbar wrote:

    > --- Martin Sevior
    > <msevior@mccubbin.ph.unimelb.edu.au> wrote: >
    > > Hi Dom, Hub and Andrew,
    > > I know you've all expressed an interest in
    > > working
    > > on next generation layout. Do you have any issues
    > > with my suggestions? If
    > > not I'll start on the "how to get there from here"
    > > plan as soon as Hub
    > > forks the tree.
    > >
    > > Cheers
    >
    > Yes please start working on it. The only thing I'm
    > a little concerned about is leaving it as open as
    > possible. By open I mean making it so that it's easy
    > to support pangoft & pangowin32 even if we start off
    > only with pangoft.

    This is als is almost totally independent of the next generation layout so
    it should be no problem. Since as Tomas has discovered, the pango specific
    stuff can be kept at or below the run level there is no overlap.

    Cheers

    Martin



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Apr 29 2002 - 07:53:18 EDT