Subject: Re: support for 32-bit Unicode
From: F J Franklin (F.J.Franklin@sheffield.ac.uk)
Date: Mon Feb 04 2002 - 04:08:53 CST
> I agree that having 32 UT_UCSChar would vaste lot of memory, and
> I would like to see a case made first why we need to support 32-bit
> Unicode.
I wonder if it's worth making this a compile-time option?
Frank
Francis James Franklin
F.J.Franklin@shef.ac.uk
It's getting them wrong that is living, getting them wrong and wrong and
wrong and then, on careful reconsideration, getting them wrong again.
That's how we know we're alive: we're wrong.
--- Philip Roth
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b25 : Mon Feb 04 2002 - 04:08:55 CST