From: Patrick Lam (plam@plam.lcs.mit.edu)
Date: Tue Mar 26 2002 - 14:43:37 EST
On Tue, Mar 26, 2002 at 05:30:29PM -0000, Tomas Frydrych wrote:
>
> > Cheesy hack: When we read the width for unicode 32, also copy it to be
> > the width for unicode 160.
>
> The "real" solution is to have two separate look up tables, one for
> translating Unicode -> Adobe and the other Adobe->Unicode. I
> have been very reluctant to go this way since the number of glyphs
> impacted is small (I do not know of other than NBS), and the
> lookup tables are sizeable. A hard coded workaround is, therefore,
> I think best.
The problem is that Adobe -> Unicode is not a function. The URL I
referenced mention that there are 8 double mappings (one adobe glyph
to two unicode chars), most of which are uncommon in most documents.
Let's stick with the hard coded workaround.
pat
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Mar 26 2002 - 14:45:14 EST