Re: ATTN: intent to release 1.1.0 based on CVS HEAD

From: Dom Lachowicz (doml@appligent.com)
Date: Sat Sep 07 2002 - 10:46:45 EDT

  • Next message: Dom Lachowicz: "Re: Encodings for strings -- what's happening?"

    On Saturday, September 7, 2002, at 02:18 AM, Andrew Dunbar wrote:

    > --- Dom Lachowicz <doml@appligent.com> wrote:
    >> FWIW, all builds are bidi capable now.
    >>
    >> http://abiword.pchasm.org/builds/nightly/
    >>
    >> Last updated Sept 4, which was probably the last
    >> time Win32 worked before I intentionally slightly
    >> broke the tree.
    >
    > I had been assuming this one wasn't up-to-date since
    > I try it now and then and it still causes Bug 3840
    > for me. (Crashes loading World.abw) I've just
    > re-opened it...
    >
    > http://bugzilla.abisource.com/show_bug.cgi?id=3840

    As noted in bug 3840 you downloaded the STABLE build and not HEAD. You
    want:

    http://abiword.pchasm.org/builds/nightly/win32/setup_abiword.exe

    NOT

    http://abiword.pchasm.org/builds/nightly/win32/setup_abiword_S.exe

    Dom

    > Andrew.
    >
    >> Dom
    >>
    >> On Friday, September 6, 2002, at 11:16 PM, Andrew
    >> Dunbar wrote:
    >>
    >>> I wonder if sombebody has an up-to-date nightly
    >> build
    >>> for Windows. I really want to test a new bidi
    >> build
    >>> and it must be a complete installer version. I
    >> can't
    >>> get .exe only versions to install on the cybercafe
    >>> computers.
    >>>
    >>> Thanks. Andrew Dunbar.
    >>>
    >>>>> On 2002.09.06 13:35 Dom Lachowicz wrote:
    >>>>> Please consider this a 1-month "head's up". I'd
    >>>> like to get 1.1.0 out
    >>>>> the door on Friday October 4, 2002. This will
    >> be
    >>>> very much a
    >>>>> "developer's release." This means that:
    >>>>>
    >>>>> * It should be considered unstable (for just
    >> about
    >>>> every conceivable
    >>>>> definition of unstable)
    >>>>> * Some features may not be fully implemented or
    >>>> may be buggy
    >>>>> * Some features that will go into 2.0 may not
    >> have
    >>>> been started yet and
    >>>>> will evolve with the 1.1.x series
    >>>>> * There will be no string or documentation
    >> freeze
    >>>>>
    >>>>> That said, this release should definitely raise
    >>>> some eyebrows in the
    >>>>> community. It will have quite a few good new
    >>>> features, bug fixes,
    >>>>> plugins, and other such updates. It should
    >>>> "reasonably work" for most
    >>>>> people, given some definition of "reasonably".
    >> I'd
    >>>> like to set the
    >>>>> baseline at "just about all 1.0.x features
    >> should
    >>>> work in 1.1.0".
    >>>>>
    >>>>> Users should be encouraged to try this release,
    >>>> but we should steer
    >>>>> them away from using it in production settings
    >> or
    >>>> as their primary WP.
    >>>>> They do so at their own risk, and doing so (to
    >>>> quote EAZen) will
    >>>>> "invoke the wrath of Dom" (whatever that
    >>>> means...). Until the 1.1.x
    >>>>> tree has stabilized substantially, we should
    >>>> strongly advocate using
    >>>>> the 1.0.x series unless there are some dire
    >>>> circumstances forcing a
    >>>>> particular user to upgrade.
    >>>>>
    >>>>> Ideally, this series will generate lots of good
    >>>> bug reports, new
    >>>>> developer interest, patches, and an increase in
    >>>> users, all leading to a
    >>>>> rock-solid and well-endowed 2.0 product.
    >>>>>
    >>>>> The tree will close only for a few hours, if
    >> that.
    >>>> Tinderbox must be
    >>>>> green in order to release. Nothing else will be
    >>>> considered
    >>>>> show-stopper. Target platforms: QNX, UNIX/GTK+2,
    >>>> Win32. There will be
    >>>>> no UNIX/GNOME2 port of this release. More news
    >>>> will follow as the
    >>>>> release date draws nearer.
    >>>>>
    >>>>> Thanks and keep up the great work,
    >>>>> Dom
    >>>>>
    >>>>>
    >>>>
    >>>>
    >>>> A whole series of random thoughts pop up on this
    >>>> one, and probably to early for atleast half of my
    >>>> questions, so, I'll itemize.
    >>>>
    >>>> A) WooHoo! Feel free to let us know what will go
    >> in
    >>>> when you make the decisions.
    >>>> B) I will emphasize the "unstable," "developers
    >>>> release, not ready for primetime" and "not to be
    >>>> used where you need it."
    >>>> C) Uwog said "invoke the wrath of dom." I
    >>>> originally said, "*at the risk of invoking the
    >> wrath
    >>>> of dom," then changed it to my new favourite
    >> running
    >>>> gag, "*at the risk of invoking 'AbiWord II: The
    >>>> Wrath of Dom'."
    >>>> D) Will there be a source option with all plugins
    >>>> included? That would be "boffo good!"
    >>>> E) ACK! GNOME IS DEAD! HE SAID IT AGAIN! (yet,
    >> if
    >>>> you're using gtk<anything>, you're using glib...)
    >>>>
    >>>> Look at that, I saved $56 on taxes...so...the
    >>>> government owes me...no, I still owe the
    >>>> government...WHAT!? $64,000!?
    >>>
    >>> =====
    >>>
    >>
    > http://linguaphile.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/translator.pl
    >>
    >>> http://www.abisource.com
    >>>
    >>> __________________________________________________
    >>> Do You Yahoo!?
    >>> Everything you'll ever need on one web page
    >>> from News and Sport to Email and Music Charts
    >>> http://uk.my.yahoo.com
    >>
    >
    > =====
    > http://linguaphile.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/translator.pl
    > http://www.abisource.com
    >
    > __________________________________________________
    > Do You Yahoo!?
    > Everything you'll ever need on one web page
    > from News and Sport to Email and Music Charts
    > http://uk.my.yahoo.com



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Sep 07 2002 - 10:49:47 EDT