[Fwd: Re: ap_Frame classes (was Re: commit (HEAD): bidi fixes and toolbar]

• Previous message: Hubert Figuiere: "Commit (HEAD): blinking caret"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

attached mail follows:

On Mon, 2003-01-27 at 05:10, Tomas Frydrych wrote:
> Hi William,
>
> > The purpose was to consolidate code that is identical across
> > platforms. So instead of cutting and pasting the same code in an
> > AP_XXXFrame class, it can simply be declared once in an AP_Frame
> > class.
> OK, I get it now; but why then do we need ap_win32Frame class,
> etc.? Should not all the the xp code be in ap_Frame class and
> anything else in ap_XXXFrame classes?

Yes, keeping in mind the distinction between xap and ap (described in my
earlier mail). I consider any duplicated code between platforms (and I
know there is some) in xap_xxxFrameImpl and ap_xxxFrame to be a bug.

Cheers,

-- 
William Lachance <william.lachance@sympatico.ca>

• Next message: Pierre Abbat: "commit: Yiddish"
• Previous message: Hubert Figuiere: "Commit (HEAD): blinking caret"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Jan 27 2003 - 16:41:09 EST