From: Martin Sevior (msevior@physics.unimelb.edu.au)
Date: Fri May 09 2003 - 11:24:41 EDT
On 9 May 2003, Rui Miguel Seabra wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I can't speak for the deb spec, but in the rpm spec I _never_ specify
> that the filename should be that.
>
> I'm only supporting that filename.
>
> It was discussed a long time ago, that the binary should be called
> abiword-2.0 and all the shared stuff should also be -2.0 so that people
> could easily have both versions installed.
>
Well please let's get this sorted out. Marc says it's AbiWord-2.0, I
thought it was AbiWord-2.0, the server file now says it's AbiWord-2.0. If
you actually name it abiword-2.0 the bonobo stuff won't work.
Let's get this straight!
Martin
> Rui
>
> On Fri, 2003-05-09 at 12:40, Martin Sevior wrote:
> > On 9 May 2003, Marc Maurer wrote:
> >
> > > Our binary is not called AbWword-2.0 since I last checked :)
> > >
> >
> > Thanks Marc! Is it set to AbiWord-2.0 now?
> >
> > Is AbiWord-2.0 the name of our executable as generated by our RPM spec
> > (and debian build system)?
> >
> > We gotta get this right!
> >
> > Cheers
> >
> > Martin
> >
> > >
> > > /cvsroot/abidistfiles/GNOME_AbiWord_Control_2_0.server,v <--
> > > GNOME_AbiWord_Control_2_0.server
> > > new revision: 1.6; previous revision: 1.5
> > > done
> > >
> > >
> --
> + No matter how much you do, you never do enough -- unknown
> + Whatever you do will be insignificant,
> | but it is very important that you do it -- Gandhi
> + So let's do it...?
>
> Please AVOID sending me WORD, EXCEL or POWERPOINT attachments.
> See http://www.fsf.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri May 09 2003 - 11:37:31 EDT