From: Rui Miguel Seabra (rms_at_1407.org)
Date: Mon Nov 10 2003 - 05:47:42 EST
Late complain:
In the spec template:
Requires: (...) /usr/lib/libfribidi.so (...)
BuildRequires: (..) /usr/include/fribidi/fribidi.h
If you find a better way to satisfy both ways, please walk forward...
Rui
On Mon, 2003-11-10 at 10:44, Marco Fioretti wrote:
> > On Mon, 2003-11-10 at 10:17, Omer Zak wrote:
> > > I'd rather understand from where did the libfribidi0 dependency come and
> > > whether it is real, before uttering '--nodeps'.
>
> > Previously, the fribidi packages where libfribidi0 and libfridi0-devel.
> > That seems to have changed.
> >
> Doesn't this mean that the "official" *abiword* RPMs recommended here from
> time to time must be changed, to depend from the packages actually available
> today, without forcing --nodeps or confusing end users?
>
> Ciao,
> Marco Fioretti
-- + No matter how much you do, you never do enough -- unknown + Whatever you do will be insignificant, | but it is very important that you do it -- Gandhi + So let's do it...?Please AVOID sending me WORD, EXCEL or POWERPOINT attachments. See http://www.fsf.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Nov 10 2003 - 05:46:18 EST