Re: beos patch2

From: Martin Sevior (msevior_at_seviorpc.ph.unimelb.edu.au)
Date: Thu Nov 13 2003 - 19:30:00 EST

Next message: Dom Lachowicz: "Re: beos patch2"

Previous message: Hubert Figuiere: "Commit (HEAD): BeOS patches"
In reply to: Daniel Furrer: "beos patch2"
Next in thread: Dom Lachowicz: "Re: beos patch2"
Reply: Dom Lachowicz: "Re: beos patch2"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

On Fri, 2003-11-14 at 07:15, Daniel Furrer wrote:
> Replaced UT_uint16 with UT_UCS4Char.
>

Does the BeoS build actually produce a complete binary?

Next message: Dom Lachowicz: "Re: beos patch2"
Previous message: Hubert Figuiere: "Commit (HEAD): BeOS patches"
In reply to: Daniel Furrer: "beos patch2"
Next in thread: Dom Lachowicz: "Re: beos patch2"
Reply: Dom Lachowicz: "Re: beos patch2"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Nov 13 2003 - 18:29:12 EST