On Fri, 2004-12-31 at 10:07 +0000, Tomas Frydrych wrote:
> Thanks Mark. There are in fact two separate int 3 instructions; one
> which is represented by a single byte opcode (0xCC) and then a two byte
> version (0xCD03); it is the former we want, which I am pretty sure is in
> GAS, as you found out, 'int3'. I suspect the reason we have not caught
> this so far is that both of these generate a breakpoint, but the former
> has a number of special properties.
>
> (Interestingly engough, the Intel docs note that both the Intel and MS
> compilers will not generate the longer instruction irrespective of the
> mnemonic.)
>
> I have changed that now.
>
Thanks.
> Happy new year to you, when it comes,
Same to you, though I imagine you're already celebrating (-:
-MG
Received on Fri Dec 31 18:29:52 2004
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Fri Dec 31 2004 - 18:29:52 CET