From: Martin Sevior (msevior_at_seviorpc.ph.unimelb.edu.au)
Date: Wed Feb 25 2004 - 20:12:35 EST
On Thu, 2004-02-26 at 00:30, Hubert Figuiere wrote:
> On Wed, 2004-02-25 at 14:19, Peter Lundqvist wrote:
>
> > I sort of like it too.
> > Perhaps something like this
> >
> > ._________. ._______.
> > |Heading|^| x Have label | |v|
> > |Level1 | | ._______.
> > |Level2 | | Fill style | |v|
> > |Level3 | | ._______.
> > |Level4 | | Display style | |v|
> > |-------| | ._______. ._______. .______.
> > |_______|v| Tab leader | |v| Indent | |v| Pagenr | |v|
>
> That is an interesting variation, and I love it.
> It offers the tradeoff to have the list of TOC levels visible, at least
> in part.
>
> BTW, on my mockup, the empty part in the dialog is for the preview that
> should provide a preview of the whole set, or at least large parts.
>
There is no place to define the properties of the Heading Label here.
You need <text before> <Label Type> <Text After> fields.
Martin
>
> Hub
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Wed Feb 25 2004 - 19:19:33 EST