Re: Are we ready for 2.0.3?

From: E . A . Zen (ericzen_at_ez-net.com)
Date: Sun Jan 11 2004 - 13:21:37 EST

Next message: Dom Lachowicz: "Re: Commit: fix unix build"

Previous message: Jordi Mas: "Re: Commit: fix unix build"
In reply to: Robert Wilhelm: "Re: Are we ready for 2.0.3?"
Next in thread: msevior_at_physics.unimelb.edu.au: "Re: Are we ready for 2.0.3?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

On 2004.01.11 10:14 Robert Wilhelm wrote:
>
> 6008 is the meta bug for 2.0.2. As it is still open we could reuse it
> for 2.0.3.

Robert, you've made my day!

I vote for the perminent 2.0.n+1 metabug in 6008!

One stop scripting.

-Eric

Next message: Dom Lachowicz: "Re: Commit: fix unix build"
Previous message: Jordi Mas: "Re: Commit: fix unix build"
In reply to: Robert Wilhelm: "Re: Are we ready for 2.0.3?"
Next in thread: msevior_at_physics.unimelb.edu.au: "Re: Are we ready for 2.0.3?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sun Jan 11 2004 - 13:17:40 EST