Re: Genericizing UT_Vector

From: Dom Lachowicz (domlachowicz_at_yahoo.com)
Date: Fri Mar 05 2004 - 08:46:51 EST

Next message: Tomas Frydrych: "commit (HEAD) imp/exp table fixes"

Previous message: Hubert Figuiere: "Genericizing UT_Vector"
In reply to: Hubert Figuiere: "Genericizing UT_Vector"
Next in thread: Tomas Frydrych: "Re: Genericizing UT_Vector"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

--- Hubert Figuiere <hfiguiere_at_teaser.fr> wrote:

> I have a cleaner solution in mind, but this would
> involve breaking a
> coding rule: using template.
[snip]

> Any pros and cons ? Now that almost almost any
> compiler we use supports
> template, I don't think this is a big issue.

Yes. We should use templates. Big, portable projects
like Mozilla use templates and exceptions now, so we
shouldn't have much trouble.

Barring that, we could borrow glib's POINTER_TO_INT()
and INT_TO_POINTER() macros which are 64-bit safe.

Dom

=====
I think the problem with the Democratic Party in general is that they've been so afraid to lose they're willing to say whatever it takes to win. And once you're willing to say whatever it takes to win, you lose. - Howard Dean

http://www.deanforamerica.com/

__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Search - Find what you’re looking for faster
http://search.yahoo.com

Next message: Tomas Frydrych: "commit (HEAD) imp/exp table fixes"
Previous message: Hubert Figuiere: "Genericizing UT_Vector"
In reply to: Hubert Figuiere: "Genericizing UT_Vector"
Next in thread: Tomas Frydrych: "Re: Genericizing UT_Vector"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Mar 05 2004 - 08:47:53 EST