I thought UT_String was to be avoided in new code.
-MG
On Mon, 2004-10-11 at 22:32 +0200, J.M. Maurer wrote:
> Just want to be sure I can use UT_String like this (seems fine to me).
Received on Mon Oct 11 23:14:58 2004
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon Oct 11 2004 - 23:14:58 CEST