It would be helpful if you could point out stuff you'd like to see
different next time. Maybe i can ask you on irc about details?
On a more general note, i've been sending in early versions of UI
patches in the hope of getting feedback. From watching other projects
i've had the impression that UI changes can sometimes lead to a lot
of controversy. If that's different over here, i'll just work on
stuff until i'm perfectly happy and then pass the patch on.
What do you think?
Rob
Am 29.09.2004 um 01:45 Uhr haben Sie geschrieben:
>
> Some lil' issues in here, but looks a lot better than what we had.
> Thanks!
>
> Marc
>
> Gladify Styles Dialog (rob)
>
> CVS:
> CVS: Enter Log. Lines beginning with `CVS:' are removed
> automatically
> CVS:
> CVS: Committing in .
> CVS:
> CVS: Modified Files:
> CVS: src/wp/ap/unix/GNUmakefile.am
> CVS: src/wp/ap/unix/ap_UnixDialog_Styles.cpp
> CVS: src/wp/ap/unix/ap_UnixDialog_Styles.glade
> CVS: src/wp/ap/unix/ap_UnixDialog_Styles.h
> CVS:
>
>
> Op di, 28-09-2004 te 22:53 +0200, schreef robsta@stereolyzer.net:
> > Hey,
> >
> > chatted a bit with martin today, he motivated me to do anonther
> take
> > on the styles dialog.
> >
> > I wasn't happy with the ui design of the previous patch anyways,
> this
> > is prolly as good as it gets for 2.2, ui-wise.
> >
> > Rob
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
> ---
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
> ---
Received on Wed Sep 29 11:03:05 2004
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Sep 29 2004 - 11:03:05 CEST