On Tue, 2005-01-11 at 14:43 +0000, Charles Goodwin wrote:
> On Tue, 2005-01-11 at 13:55 +0100, J.M. Maurer wrote:
> > I can't see 1 single reason to prefer jpg [over png].
>
> Um, photographic images? Right tool for the right job; jpegs are great
> for highly coloured, highly detailed images. Whereas pngs need massive
> files to store equivalent images.
Erm, when the plugin is not available, the png/jpg/svg images are
*purely* there for fallback. To give an idea of the contents that should
be there. Not for perfect rendering or whatever. The user should still
install the plugin to get the functionality he needs (and we should
inform him which plugin he misses).
Marc
Received on Tue Jan 11 16:25:08 2005
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Jan 11 2005 - 16:25:08 CET