>
> On Sat, 2005-06-04 at 02:02 +0100, Roland Kay wrote:
>> Hi Hub,
>>
>> Here's an update of the patch that uses UT_UTF8String instead. Is there
>> a
>> note anywhere in the code to say that UT_String in deprecated?
>
> Talk to Martin... he insists on not depreciating it ....
*sigh* Yes Hub. We've had this conversation many times.
There are *some* occasions when UT_String is appropriate (like when you
know an 8 bit char might use the most significant bit).
That said, UT_UTF8String is almost always the appropriate class to use.
Martin
Received on Sat Jun 4 16:10:44 2005
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sat Jun 04 2005 - 16:10:44 CEST