Re: New suites vs. common release cycle [Was: Productivity suite]

From: Martin Sevior <msevior_at_physics.unimelb.edu.au>
Date: Mon Jun 27 2005 - 11:30:08 CEST

Hi Bill,
         Unfortunately not much has been done. I'll CC the AbiWord list
with this. It's clearly important.

Cheers

martin

On Mon, 2005-06-20 at 09:24 +0100, Bill Haneman wrote:
> ...
>
> >I posted about it here at least 3 week ago. There were no negative
> >comments at all. We all took this to mean it was approved and I submitted
> >the abiword-2.3.1 package.
> >
> >
> Hi Martin:
>
> How's the accessibility work going on this package? Have you tested
> with GOK or gnopernicus?
>
> Testing GNOME Applications for Accessibility
> http://developer.gnome.org/projects/gap/testing/index.html
>
> Information on putting together an accessibility sanity test, and
> existing sanity tests for GNOME:
> http://developer.gnome.org/projects/gap/sanity-testing/index.html
>
> The GNOME Accessibility Guide for Developers needs updating, but it's
> still mostly valid:
> http://developer.gnome.org/projects/gap/guide/gad
>
> best regards,
>
> Bill
>
> >Cheers
> >
> >Martin
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> gnome-hackers mailing list
> gnome-hackers@gnome.org
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-hackers
>
Received on Mon Jun 27 11:30:04 2005

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon Jun 27 2005 - 11:30:07 CEST