>> >> ri.m_pText->setPosition(iPos+1);
>> >
>> >You could just use the ++ operator instead of that, and the code will
>> >probably more efficient with it.
>>
>> this is a myth. ++ does not change efficiency as is.
>
>If a compiler was not able to recognise i+1 and optimise it just as easily
>as i++ I would be looking for another compiler.
>
>In this case, the ++ operator is overloaded, so it _does_ make a difference here. This however is hardly related to this thread, so let's please get back on topic.
>
>Bye!
> Marc
Received on Tue Mar 1 21:38:48 2005
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Mar 01 2005 - 21:38:48 CET