Re: Issues for 2.6

From: Hubert Figuiere <hfiguiere_at_teaser.fr>
Date: Thu Jan 18 2007 - 19:41:50 CET

J.M. Maurer wrote:
> On Thu, 2007-01-18 at 12:13 -0500, Dominic Lachowicz wrote:
>>> Ok, I'll bite. Have been working on the wiki page [1] a bit, too.
>>> Plans:
>>> + GOption patch: 1 day (maybe 2 evenings)
>>> + Glibification, see also [2]:
>>> 1) String funcs: at most 1-2 weeks of occasional spare time
>>> hacking needed.
>
> How does this differ from hub's work to use std::string (finally!) ? We
> don't want to have yet another mass replacing of string funcs I guess?

I just did put std::string in on place were it makes it easier for
resource tracking. I'm not gonna do more. I still need to find the
proper way to do it with unicode in mind.

I have another patch were I refactor UT_Stringbuf in a template. It is
purely from an implementation stand point.

Hub
Received on Thu Jan 18 19:41:51 2007

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Jan 18 2007 - 19:41:51 CET