getting rid of PL_StruxFmtHandle?

From: Hubert Figuiere <hfiguiere_at_teaser.fr>
Date: Wed Mar 07 2007 - 02:48:57 CET

PL_StruxFmtHandle is defined as a void *. Then it is cast away virtually
everywhere. Doesn't that defeat the purpose of strong typing that C++
provides?

If looks like it is not an easy take, but what about suppressing it?
What would be the base type? fl_Layout*

Same question for PL_StruxDocHandle. Would it be pf_Frag_Strux* or
pf_Frag* ?

Thanks for the feedback.

Hub
Received on Wed Mar 7 02:48:39 2007

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Mar 07 2007 - 02:48:39 CET