Re: getting rid of PL_StruxFmtHandle?

Dominic Lachowicz wrote:
>
> On 3/6/07, Martin Sevior <msevior@physics.unimelb.edu.au> wrote:
>> I'm pretty sure it was cast to void * to enable AbiWord to utilize the
>> old UT_Vector class.
>
> If I had to guess, I'd guess that it was to avoid having text/ptbl
> depend on text/fmt explicitly.

You can use a forward declared type most of of the time.

Hub
Received on Wed Mar 7 16:17:02 2007