Re: RFC: Removing QNX source from TRUNK

From: Martin Sevior <martines_at_unimelb.edu.au>
Date: Wed Jan 16 2008 - 03:35:19 CET

On Wed, 2008-01-16 at 00:48 +0100, J.M. Maurer wrote:
>
> On Tue, 2008-01-15 at 18:37 -0500, Hubert Figuiere wrote:
> > On Wed, 2008-01-16 at 00:33 +0100, J.M. Maurer wrote:
> > >
> > > On Tue, 2008-01-15 at 14:55 -0500, Hubert Figuiere wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, 2008-01-15 at 20:35 +0100, Robert Staudinger wrote:
> > > > > are there any objections to the removal of the QNX sources from trunk?
> > > >
> > > > +1
> > >
> > > conservative bastard!
> > >
> > > +100
> >
> > That was an elecronic vote. anybody can stuff ballots ;-)
> >
> > More seriously I don't think QNX support matters anymore.
>
> Even if it did, we obviously can't maintain it.
>

*sigh* It is sad to see it go. It used to work very well but there is no
point anymore.

gtk is engulfing and devouring all platforms now so any new platform
that comes along aims to port gtk to it.

+1 from me too.

Martin

> Marc
>
Received on Wed Jan 16 03:57:08 2008

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Jan 16 2008 - 03:57:08 CET