Heads-up: licensing on Slashdot

From: Ryan Pavlik <abiryan_at_ryand.net>
Date: Wed Jan 23 2008 - 08:35:09 CET

As seen on Slashdot, we apparently have 2 obnoxious BSD's in our source
tree. At least one is Ispell, they didn't show the other one.
http://it.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=08/01/23/0131204&from=rss
http://fossology.org/video/abiword.mov

Couldn't tell exactly, but it also looks like a few files might have old
versions of the GPL 2 in them.

Ryan
Received on Wed Jan 23 08:36:21 2008

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: J.M. Maurer: "Re: Heads-up: licensing on Slashdot"
Previous message: Ryan Pavlik: "Re: Two Proposals (inter-related)"
Next in thread: J.M. Maurer: "Re: Heads-up: licensing on Slashdot"
Maybe reply: J.M. Maurer: "Re: Heads-up: licensing on Slashdot"
Reply: J.M. Maurer: "Re: Heads-up: licensing on Slashdot"
Reply: Hubert Figuiere: "Re: Heads-up: licensing on Slashdot"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ By Date ] [ By Thread ] [ By Subject ] [ By Author ] [ By messages with attachments ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Jan 23 2008 - 08:36:21 CET