On Sun, 2008-03-30 at 00:26 +0100, J.M. Maurer wrote:
> I don't really know 'be', but isn't there a Latin and a Cyrillic version
> of the language?
Doh! I associated be with Belgian locale. Silly me.
Sorry for the noise.
Hub
Received on Sun Mar 30 00:43:38 2008
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sun Mar 30 2008 - 00:43:38 CET