> Thanks for pointing this out. Before I step off the the edge, I'll read the
> HTML specs again, and re-assess what we need from the headers.
That @#$! designed by marketroids and weenies! I have some scars in need
of a healing. Perhaps someone can recommend a good shrink? ;-)
> Seriously, though, I'm not going into this with the approach of trying to
> interpret what the user's intention was, unless it just fits in. If there's
> bad HTML, don't expect a fuzzy logic mechanism that will interpret what the
> user's intention was. That's not my style ;-)
It's not the user's intention any more. It's what the stone-headed hippy
put in the HTML editor. If you manage to replicate Netscape's handling
of comments without asking anyone about it, I'll buy you a dinner
if we ever happen to be at the same place at the same time. I won't
be at the Worldcon in Australia this year, though. :-)
--
.-. .-. Life is a sexually transmitted disease.
(_ \ / _)
| dave@srce.hr
| dave@fly.cc.fer.hr